Thank you for submitting your entries for the "7th Blog Awards Challenge: Bloggermania: Challenging The Platforms Of Old Media". We would want to remind everyone about the number of words required for a post to enter the challenge.
Here are the 3 final entries. Please read the voting rules before casting your vote/s.
***
Traditional Journalism VS BloggerMania by Kwentong Miko and General Nonsense
LAKANDIWA
Magandang araw sa lahat, masugid na mambabasa
Isa pong Blogtalastasan, sinikap kong inihanda:
Ang Traditional na Media, noon pa man ay subok na,
Laban sa uso at bagong Blogging – ‘to ang ating paksa.
Sa Traditional na Media, mga bagay na kasama
Dyaryo, radio at magazine, pati TV ay ang bida.
Sa kabilang panig naman, sinasabing BloggerMania
Dahil sa murang internet, nararating din ang masa.
Pagdating sa journalism, ano ba ang naaangkop?
Blogs na likha ng Netizen, doon ba tayo tututok?
O manatili sa luma, tradisyunal na at subok?
Halina’t ating alamin, bawal ang aantok-antok.
TRADITIONAL
Mayroon pa bang uubra, sa pahayag na tradisyon.
Masusing pagbabalita, ganap na imbestigasyon,
Mahigpit na pagsusuri, paglakap ng impormasyon,
Totohanang paglalahad, sinusumpaang propesyon. Read more >>>
Blindspots of Blogging by PROSETITUTE
In today's Web-driven arena of information, print journalism seems to be a fading name in the game.
The advent of blogging has undeniably shaken the foundations of traditional media by introducing new sources of information. It has challenged the radio scene with its podcast, the television with its vlog (video log), and, of course, the newspaper with its blog (web log). The internet has indeed drawn a new line of media, and, consequently, a new line of contention between blogging and the old media. Read more >>>
THE RELEVANCE OF OLD MEDIA AND CARLOS CONDE IS THAT THEY ARE IRRELEVANT by the Philippine Daily Idiot
FIRST QUESTION. So, is Old Media still relevant in the blogosphere?
Answer: A big It is.
FIRST OF ALL, in the unlikely event that I, self-important blogger, will be weaned from my daily cud of self-important Op-Ed pieces in the Philippine Star, I'd be sad.
I would miss thrashing Old Media.
FOR EXAMPLE, I've been asking no end: How the hell did Dr. Charles Chante become an Op-Ed page columnist at the Philippine Star?
With kindof due respect to the doctor, I am nevertheless shocked by his writing, which I could do by Googling and cut-and-pasting.
BUT MORE THAN THAT, I would terribly miss pseudo-meta-analyzing the news stories in Old Media. Read more >>>
-----
If you want to vote, here are the guidelines:
* To promote peer-to-peer recognition and respect only bona fide bloggers can vote for the competition. Anonymous voters without a valid blog will not be added to the tally of votes.
* Voters must be blogging for at least three (3) months with a minimum of thirty entries in his blog prior to his voting in the competition. This will eliminate phantom voters and reduce incidence of cheating.
* A voter is allowed to pick two entries among the finalists.
* The votes are added up and the winner is declared with a Reader’s Choice Award citation.
* The total number of votes (converted into weights) are added to the other weight points as set in the Winner Selection Criteria.
Are you qualified to vote? Then LEAVE A COMMENT here (please don't use the chatbox) with your best entry picks. We will manually check your blog for qualification requirements before counting your votes.
Voting ends October 24th 2008.
***
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





6 comments:
kudos to the Philippine Daily Idiot post. His scribe, i mean his blog is impeccable. I choose not to mention scribe and pick the latter because it somehow portray the difference of old media and the ever rising blogosphere. A scribe, A writer, or a journalist in the old media setting can't be all labelled as a blogger. In as much as any person who can write a list of groceries to buy can not be called as a writer or as a book author. The distiction between a writer / journalist and a blogger is diaphanously visible in the monitor and newspaper. You don't need a keen eye for that.
To reach blogospehere is just within our finger tips. We don't need a writer's mind and think deeply to have a critical analysis on a certain topic to arouse reader's understanding just to be able to blog. I can be Oprah or a resurrected Mother Theresa blogging and no one can validate my identity. I can have my narcisstic opinion about my self, God, and the Universe and no single soul can antagonize that ( i am managing my comment box ).
Its not a requirement to have a common sense, logical and rational thinking, flawless grammar nor a censorship for I don't have an editor to balk the publishing of my blog. Unless a blogger like Philippine daily idiot would marshall and mark me as a spam.
Im hoping that to be a certified blogger or to reach blogosphere, blogs should undergo Osmotic action. Filtering of words thru censorship and reliability. Thus making a netizen or an inept blogger experience blogger's block.
This might change a blogger's image of somewhat like just having a tsismis with a kapitbahay.
All the three entries are good.
Para sa akin, it boils down to whoever explained it the clearest (ung may "oo-nga" factor in the end).
I vote for Philippine Daily Idiot and Prosetitute.
well-written entries...but i agree more with philippine daily idiot.
i vote for PROSETITUTE. i like the way his ideas flow in his style of writing. very well explained and comparison between old and new was clear.
Puwede pa bang mag-vote?
My YES goes to: Blindspots of Blogging by PROSETITUTE.
Very professionally and ethically done. Good job!
Good luck!
My vote is for Prosetitute! Very well written.
Post a Comment